Spatial and temporal dynamics of land cover types from different satellite databases on the example of South-Eastern Crimea

##plugins.themes.ibsscustom.article.main##

  • Authors: A. V. Drygval1,2,3, P. V. Drygval1,2,4, V. A. Tabunschik3, T. Yu. Gorbunova3
  • Affiliations:
    1. T. I. Vyazemsky Karadag Scientific Station – Nature Reserve of RAS – Branch of A. O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Feodosia, Kurortnoye, Russian Federation
    2. RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation
    3. A. O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Sevastopol, Russian Federation
    4. FSE RTC RCSH, Moscow, Russian Federation,
  • Issue: Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024)
  • Section: Structure, functioning and dynamics of ecosystems
  • Pages: 32–49
  • Keywords: land cover types, satellite databases, South-Eastern Crimea, landscapes, factor analysis, analysis of variance
  • DOI: 10.21072/eco.2024.09.3.04
  • UDC: [911.52:528.8](292.471-12)
  • Published: 2025-02-26
  • Views: 25 Downloads: 12
Download fulltext (RUS)
Google Scholar Google Scholar
Drygval A. V., Drygval P. V., Tabunschik V. A., Gorbunova T. Yu. Spatial and temporal dynamics of land cover types from different satellite databases on the example of South-Eastern Crimea. Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, 2025, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 32–49. https://doi.org/10.21072/eco.2024.09.3.04

##plugins.themes.ibsscustom.article.details##

Abstract

This paper analyzes changes in the areas of land cover types of the South-Eastern Crimea (on the territory as a whole and separately by landscape contours) in dynamics. Thematic maps of land cover types were taken from open spatial databases: Globcover, ESRI Land Cover, Copernicus Global Land Cover, Land Cover CCI; advantages and disadvantages of their use are considered. It is shown that Land Cover CCI and Globcover having the lowest spatial resolution of all databases do not allow to see small elements of land cover, which are important for more local processes in landscapes, although Land Cover CCI has a wide temporal cover-age of the territory (1992–2020). ESRI Land Cover is suitable for such a task because of its spatial resolution. The Copernicus Global Land Cover database did not show any dynamics of land cover types. Factor analysis was conducted to identify changes in land cover types in South-Eastern Crimea in the direction of increasing or decreasing areas in the considered databases. In order to compare satellite databases among themselves, a variance analysis of the data on land cover types unified to a single classification was carried out.

Keywords: land cover types, satellite databases, South-Eastern Crimea, landscapes, factor analysis, analysis of variance

Authors

A. V. Drygval

 junior researcher

T. I. Vyazemsky Karadag Scientific Station – Nature Reserve of RAS – Branch of A. O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Feodosia, Kurortnoye, Russian Federation / RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation / A. O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Sevastopol, Russian Federation
P. V. Drygval

senior teacher, junior researcher

T. I. Vyazemsky Karadag Scientific Station – Nature Reserve of RAS – Branch of A. O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Feodosia, Kurortnoye, Russian Federation / RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation / FSE RTC RCSH, Moscow, Russian Federation,
V. A. Tabunschik

researcher

A. O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Sevastopol, Russian Federation
T. Yu. Gorbunova

PhD, senior researcher

A. O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, Sevastopol, Russian Federation

References

Багрова Л. А. Особенности природы и освоения естественных рекреационных ресурсов Юго-восточного горного Крыма : дис. … канд. геогр. наук : 11.00.01. – Симферополь, 1974. – 206 с.

Горбунова Т. Ю., Гапон С. В., Горбунов Р. В. Картографирование типов наземных покровов субсредиземногорских низкогорных ландшафтов средствами геоматики (на примере Юго-Восточного Крыма) // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер.: Экология и безопасность жизнедеятельности. – 2017. – Т. 25, № 1. – C. 104–115. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2310-2017-25-1-104-115

Кочкин М. А. Леса Крыма. – Симферополь : Крымиздат, 1952. – 102 с.

Современные ландшафты Крыма и сопредельных акваторий / науч. ред. Е. А. Позаченюк. – Симферополь : Бизнес-Информ, 2009. – 668 с.

Табунщик В. А., Горбунов Р. В. Динамика типов наземного покрова (land cover) в пределах бассейнов рек северо-западного склона Крымских гор // Геология, география и глобальная энергия. – 2022. – № 3. – С. 78–88. – https://doi.org/10.54398/20776322_2022_3_78

Copernicus Global Land Cover Layers : CGLS-LC100 Collection 3. – URL: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/COPERNICUS_Landcover_100m_Proba-V-C3_Global (accessed: 20.09.2022).

Download CCI LC products // ESA. Climate Change Initiatiue / Europ. Space Agency. – URL: https://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/?q=node/164 (accessed: 20.11.2022).

GlobCover // DUE. Date user element / Europ. Space Agency. – URL: http://due.ESRIn.esa.int/page_globcover.php (accessed: 03.10.2022).

ESRI Land Cover // ESRI / Environmental Systems Research Inst. – URL: https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/landcover/ (accessed: 20.09.2022).

Fritz S., See L., Perger C., McCallum I., Schill C., Schepaschenko D., Duerauer M., Karner M., Dresel C., Laso-Bayas J.-C., Lesiv M., Moorthy I., Salk C. F., Danylo O., Sturn T., Albrecht F., You L., Kraxner F., Obersteiner M. A global dataset of crowdsourced land cover and land use reference data // Scientific Data. – 2017. – Vol. 4. – Art. 170075. – URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201775. – Publ.: 13.06.2017.

Kaptue Tchuente A. T., Roujean J.-L., Faroux S. ECOCLIMAP-II: An ecosystem classification and land surface parameters database of Western Africa at 1 km resolution for the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) project // Remote Sensing of Environment. – 2010. – Vol. 114, iss. 5. – Р. 961–976. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.12.008

Manakos I., Tomaszewska M., Gkinis I., Brovkina O., Filchev L., Gitas L. G. I. Z., Halabuk A., Inalpulat M., Irimescu A., Jelev G., Karantzalos K., Katagis T., Kupková L., Lavreniuk M., Mesaroš M., Mihailescu D., Nita M., Rusnak T., Stych P., Zemek F., Albrechtová J., Campbell P. Comparison of global and continental land cover products for selected study areas in South Central and Eastern European region // Remote Sensing. – 2018. – Vol. 10, iss. 12. – Art. 1967. – https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121967. – Publ.: 06.12.2018.

Potapov P., Hansen M. C., Pickens A., Hernandez-Serna A., Tyukavina A., Turubanova S., Zalles V., Li X., Khan A., Stolle F., Harris N., Song X.P., Baggett A., Kommareddy I., Kommareddy A. The global 2000–2020 land cover and land use change dataset derived from the landsat archive: first results // Frontiers in Remote Sensing. – 2022. – Vol. 3. – Art. 856903. – URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/remote-sensing/articles/10.3389/frsen.2022.856903/full. – Publ.: 13.04.2022.

Saah D., Tenneson K., Matin M., Uddin K., Cutter P., Poortinga A., Nguyen Q. H., Patterson M., Johnson G., Markert K., Flores A., Anderson E., Weigel A., Ellenberg W. L., Bhargava R., Aekakkararungroj A., Bhandari B., Khanal N., Housman I. W., Potapov P., Tyukavina A., Maus P., Ganz D., Clinton N., Chishtie F. Land cover mapping in data scarce environments: challenges and opportunities // Frontiers in Environmental Science. – 2019. – Vol. 7. – Art. 150. – URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00150/full. – Publ.: 05.11.2019.

Singh S. K., Mustak S. K., Srivastava P. K., Szabó S., Islam T. Predicting spatial and decadal LULC changes through cellular automata Markov chain models using Earth observation datasets and geo-information // Environmental Processes. – 2015. – Vol. 2, iss. 1. – Р. 61–78. – https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-015-0062-x

Singh S., Singh C., Mukherjee S. Impact of land-use and land-cover change on groundwater quality in the Lower Shiwalik hills: A remote sensing and GIS based approach // Open Geosciences. – 2010. – Vol. 2, iss. 2. – P. 124-131. – URL: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/v10085-010-0003-x/html. – Publ.: 01.06.2010.

Twisa S., Mwabumba M., Kurian M., Buchroithner M. F. Impact of land-use/land-cover change on drinking water ecosystem services in Wami River basin, Tanzania // Resources. – 2020. – Vol. 9, iss. 4. – Art. 37. – https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9040037. – Publ.: 02.04.2020.

Yang J., Huang X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019 // Earth System Science Data. – 2021. – Vol. 13, iss. 8. – P. 3907–3925. – https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021

Venter Z. S., Barton D. N., Chakraborty T., Simensen T., Singh G. Global 10 m land use land cover datasets: A comparison of dynamic world, world cover and ESRI land cover // Remote Sensing. – 2022. – Vol. 14, iss. 16. – Art. 4101. – URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/16. – Publ.: 21.08.2022.

Wang J., Wei H., Cheng K., Ochir A., Shao Ya., Yao J., Wu Yu., Han X., Davaasuren D., Chonokhuu S., Zhou Ye., Zhang M., Cao X., Gao M., Zhu J., Li Yi., Li Q., Liang X., Li K. Updatable dataset revealing decade changes in land cover types in Mongolia // Geoscience Data Journal. – 2022. – Vol. 9, iss. 2. – P. 341–354. – https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.149

Funding

Работа выполнена в рамках государственного задания ФИЦ ИнБЮМ по теме «Изучение особенностей функционирования и динамики субтропических и тропических прибрежных экосистем в условиях изменения климата и антропогенной нагрузки с использованием методов дистанционных исследований, технологий облачной обработки информации и машинного обучения для создания научных основ их рационального использования» (№ гос. регистрации 124030100030-0). Работа поддержана Программой стратегического академического лидерства РУДН.

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.